For this week only, your donations will be doubled at no extra cost to you through the Big Give. Donate today!

Cornish seascape Sue Ranger

Concern nature protection pitched as barrier to economic growth

23 Apr 2025

3 minute read

Aleksandra Chernysheva (Parliamentary Affairs Officer) reflects on whether the UK Government is ignoring nature at the expense of economic growth, and how a healthy marine environment can deliver both.

This month, the Environment Secretary announced the conclusion of the Corry Review. Led by the economist Dan Corry, the Corry Review examined whether the UK’s regulatory landscape is fit for purpose, and to develop recommendations to ensure that regulation across DEFRA is driving economic growth whilst protecting the environment.

The Corry Review concluded that the UK’s current system of environmental regulation is inconsistent and complex, predicated on a “long-entrenched precautionary principle” that inhibits economic growth. Corry made a suite of recommendations to reform environmental regulation, so it can deliver for both nature recovery and economic growth.

There is a lot to be welcomed in the review, like the recommendation for greater clarity on outcomes for regulators, a new industry-funded Nature Market Accelerator and more autonomy for trusted nature groups, which could boost green finance and scale up restoration.

However, we are concerned that other measures could open the door to the weakening of existing environmental protections.

Cheshire Pond (Gov.UK site)

A pond created for the District Level Licensing scheme in Cheshire

Credit: Cheshire West and Cheshire Council

More broadly, we are aware that the Corry review is part of a growing body of work to position the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs as a “key economic growth department.” Concerning narratives are continuing to emerge from the UK Government that pitch our vital nature protections as a key barrier to economic growth:

A list of recent concerning narratives

The UK Government’s growth agenda is not only at odds with nature but also with public sentiment. A recent YouGov poll commissioned by a group of environmental charities revealed 71% of the public would support increased planning protections for green and blue spaces. Another poll by the Wildlife Trusts showed that 66% of the UK public believes that nature is fundamental to economic growth. Here at the Marine Conservation Society, we know that marine regeneration and sustainable economic growth can – and should - go hand in hand.

How a Sustainable Blue Economy can deliver for both nature and growth

Investing in ocean restoration can deliver localised economic growth centered in coastal communities.

A thriving marine environment will support jobs in existing sectors like tourism and leisure, and could also create new jobs within coastal regeneration, research and monitoring, and enforcement. Analysis of marine restoration programmes in the US revealed that 15-30 jobs were created for every $1 million USD spent. This created six times more jobs than the equivalent investment into oil and gas and at least seven times more jobs than in carbon capture. Whilst the US and UK economies vary in size, these are promising signals for the potential of nature-led economic growth. Overall, restoring and protecting coastal ecosystems has the potential to deliver a net economic benefit of £10.1bn by 2050.

At the Marine Conservation Society, we will continue championing nature-led economic growth and advocating for targeted investment and the right policy conditions that are needed to kickstart a sustainable blue economy in the UK.

Bournemouth Pier from the air UK Nicholas E Jones

Bournemouth Pier from the air

Credit: Nicholas E Jones via Shutterstock

How we will safeguard the marine environment as the changes progress

Alongside our sustainable blue economy work, we will also continue advocating for a joined-up Marine Spatial Prioritisation Plan that takes into account all the various demands placed on our ocean, directing activity away from the most environmentally sensitive areas. By avoiding environmentally sensitive sites in the first place, the need to compensate for adverse damage would be decreased. If implemented, this will provide much-needed clarity on what activity takes place and where.

As the proposed reforms progress, we look forward to engaging with the Government to ensure that, amidst ambitious plans for offshore wind, environmental protections remain robust.

Never miss an update

Sign up to receive our emails